Statistically valid
Response counts are calibrated to produce ±5–9% margin of error at 95% confidence, scaled to community population — the same standard national firms publish to councils.
Outcomes
Why Southwind
Response counts are calibrated to produce ±5–9% margin of error at 95% confidence, scaled to community population — the same standard national firms publish to councils.
Address-based random sample, demographic monitoring, and cross-tabulation across age, ward, household income, and tenure ensure results reflect the full community, not the loudest voices.
Findings reports follow the format elected officials already recognize: executive summary, benchmark trend lines, Priority Investment Rating chart, and verbatim open-ended responses.
Importance-Satisfaction (I-S) analysis and Priority Investment Rating — the same framework cited in ETC Institute and NRC/Polco council reports. No proprietary black-box scoring.
National firms typically quote $25,000–$60,000 for a CPI-equivalent statistically valid resident survey. Southwind delivers the same instrument structure, sampling rigor, and deliverables starting at $6,900.
Raw dataset, cleaned dataset with block-level coordinates, final report, and presentation files are transferred to your organization. No platform subscription, no data retained by Southwind, no renewal lock-in.
What's Included
Statistically valid resident satisfaction and priority survey for cities, counties, and public agencies. Mirrors the structure of the ETC-style resident survey municipalities already recognize. Starting at $6,900.
Business community perception and climate assessment for chambers and EDOs — workforce, regulatory, infrastructure, and growth-barrier scoring. Starting at $2,800.
Confidential employee satisfaction and organizational health survey for city staff and departments. Starting at $2,200.
Standard CPI℠ covers overall service satisfaction, perceptions of place, city leadership, police and fire services, code enforcement, city maintenance, traffic flow, parks and recreation, city communications, customer service, and demographics — the same category breadth a council expects from a national firm.
Online portal hosted at [CommunityName]Survey.org, mobile-optimized and ADA-accessible, paired with mailed packets to a random residential address sample.
Address-based sampling via national list brokerage, USPS-mailed invitations on city letterhead, plus email and SMS follow-ups where contact data is available. Spanish translation included on request.
Executive summary, full Priority Investment Rating analysis, benchmark comparisons, verbatim open-ends, data tables, and a virtual presentation of findings. In-person council presentation available as an add-on.
Our Process
Kickoff with staff to confirm goals and service categories. Three to four drafts of the instrument, Spanish translation available, city-letterhead cover letter, and a calibrated address-based sampling plan. Deliverable: approved instrument, branded survey portal link, and written sampling plan.
Mailed packets to every household in the sample, email and SMS follow-ups to non-respondents, address verification, and a standing QC protocol with 10% supervisor review. Deliverable: raw and cleaned datasets, tabulated summary, and full verbatim open-ended responses.
Priority Investment Rating scoring (CPI℠ = Importance% × (1 − Satisfaction%)), working session with staff to review preliminary findings, final written report, and presentation of findings. Deliverable: final report, raw dataset with block-level coordinates, and project-manager presentation.
Who It's For
Project Timeline
Week 1
Goals, service categories, sampling plan. First instrument draft.
Week 2
Up to two revision rounds. City sign-off. Portal staged at [Community]Survey.org.
Weeks 3–5
Mail drop, email and SMS follow-ups, low-response targeting, daily QC.
Week 6
Data cleaning, weighting, Priority Investment Rating, draft report.
Weeks 7–8
Working session with staff, final report, virtual council presentation.
Add-Ons
Optional deliverables you can layer onto a base engagement.
Web-based results viewer, filterable by service and demographic.
Geocoded response heat maps and geographic satisfaction patterns.
Compare results to Oklahoma / Kansas community averages.
Cross-tab analysis by age, income, tenure, and ownership.
Add households beyond the standard hybrid sample to oversample a ward, annexed area, or rural fringe.
Full survey translation and bilingual report summary.
On-site delivery; travel quoted by region.
Moderated community discussion of findings.
Individual department-level breakdown.
Year-over-year comparison, Year 2 and beyond.
FAQ
Related Services
Ongoing hosting, updates, content, and social media support after launch.
Explore →Chambers, EDOs, cities, tourism, Main Streets, nonprofits.
Explore →Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, and the broader Midwest.
Explore →Quantified outcomes from real engagements.
Explore →Recent websites, brand systems, and campaigns.
Explore →5.0-star feedback from chambers, EDOs, and cities.
Explore →GEO, SEO, and economic development articles.
Explore →Let's talk
Schedule a free consultation and we'll map a practical plan for your goals, your team, and your budget.